Climate Change Discussion

Talk Science, Stats, Climate, Meteorology, or even Geology!
Post Reply
User avatar
Weather101
Storm Chaser
Storm Chaser
Posts: 5092
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:27 am
Location: Richmond
Elevation: 3 Ft
Has thanked: 4754 times
Been thanked: 7100 times

Re: Winter 2020-2021

Post by Weather101 »

wetcoast91 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 7:28 am Doing a MSC in Atmospheric Science years ago saw me conduct numerous projects (experiments) in the field as it pertains to the influence of man made CO2 and CH4 emissions and climate change.

Yes there are what I now deem to be external factors within and outside the atmosphere. Overall...the one constant is that humans are having a major impact on the climate and the outlook is one that sees a warming climate in the poles.
read this abbyjr
All about them Cowboys !!! 🤠 🤠
User avatar
AbbyJr
Storm Chaser
Storm Chaser
Posts: 5591
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:14 pm
Location: Abbotsford
Elevation: 50m(164ft)
Has thanked: 10306 times
Been thanked: 10072 times

Re: Winter 2020-2021

Post by AbbyJr »

Weather101 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:42 am Dude I can send you 100 studies done by scientists your still not going too care ? Let alone believe it so I'm not wasting my time. Your just going too put your naive blinders on it's pretty ridiculous.
We can agree to disagree. :thumbup:
Central Abbotsford
50m (164ft)

2022/23 season snowfall: 76.8cm

:team: :snowwindow: :snowman:
Ovonucks
Cloud Watcher
Cloud Watcher
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 9:04 pm
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 161 times

Re: Winter 2020-2021

Post by Ovonucks »

Weather101 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:42 am Dude I can send you 100 studies done by scientists your still not going too care ? Let alone believe it so I'm not wasting my time. Your just going too put your naive blinders on it's pretty ridiculous.
"From the media" lol. Guy doesn't realize the CONTENT in the article comes from actual studies. By scientists. Dude has taken the Trump "fake news" mantra too literally.
User avatar
Storm
Storm Chaser
Storm Chaser
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:09 pm
Location: North Burnaby/Burquitlam
Has thanked: 2397 times
Been thanked: 11310 times

Re: Winter 2020-2021

Post by Storm »

AbbyJr wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:18 am I'm not reading that source because it's from the media. Send me a link to an actual study done by scientists and I'll read it.
tenor.gif
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
North Burnaby/Burquitlam
Elevation - 64 M./210 Feet
User avatar
wetcoast91
Storm Chaser
Storm Chaser
Posts: 6153
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 3:12 pm
Location: New Westminster
Elevation: 106m
Has thanked: 6125 times
Been thanked: 14033 times

Re: Climate Change Discussion

Post by wetcoast91 »

I would respect climate change deniers way more if they just outright said they didn't give a two shits about a warming climate. My brother has said exactly that...he is 39 and the prospect of him being directly impacted is next to 0 in his lifetime.
User avatar
stuffradio
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2416
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:07 pm
Location: Maple Ridge
Has thanked: 3758 times
Been thanked: 5903 times
Contact:

Re: Climate Change Discussion

Post by stuffradio »

wetcoast91 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 12:12 pm I would respect climate change deniers way more if they just outright said they didn't give a two shits about a warming climate. My brother has said exactly that...he is 39 and the prospect of him being directly impacted is next to 0 in his lifetime.
I bet if the hyperbole from climate alarmists weren't there, there would hardly be people being vocal against the idea of global warming. There are headlines with things like "Earth will be ice-free by 2014" or something like that, and then it doesn't happen and they just get made fun of. Why not just focus on technology efficiency, policies reducing earth policy by developing cleaner technology, etc? I doubt there would be huge backlashes against these ideas if they governments just worked on trying to get companies to develop cleaner ways of doing things instead of claiming "2030 is beyond the climate tipping point" or something similar.
User avatar
Weather101
Storm Chaser
Storm Chaser
Posts: 5092
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:27 am
Location: Richmond
Elevation: 3 Ft
Has thanked: 4754 times
Been thanked: 7100 times

Re: Winter 2020-2021

Post by Weather101 »

Ovonucks wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:34 am "From the media" lol. Guy doesn't realize the CONTENT in the article comes from actual studies. By scientists. Dude has taken the Trump "fake news" mantra too literally.
lmao he doesn't even read it because he thinks anything is fake, This is why we will never fix a warming planet because their is millions of people like him.
Nito clearly explained his study did you see Abbyjr saying anything about it? People who deny have zero facts they just say " not true" lmao
Last edited by Weather101 on Thu Oct 01, 2020 12:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
All about them Cowboys !!! 🤠 🤠
User avatar
Weather101
Storm Chaser
Storm Chaser
Posts: 5092
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:27 am
Location: Richmond
Elevation: 3 Ft
Has thanked: 4754 times
Been thanked: 7100 times

Re: Winter 2020-2021

Post by Weather101 »

AbbyJr wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:33 am We can agree to disagree. :thumbup:
lol that only works when there isn't actual legit facts proving that your wrong...
User avatar
AbbyJr
Storm Chaser
Storm Chaser
Posts: 5591
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:14 pm
Location: Abbotsford
Elevation: 50m(164ft)
Has thanked: 10306 times
Been thanked: 10072 times

Re: Climate Change Discussion

Post by AbbyJr »

stuffradio wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 12:29 pm I bet if the hyperbole from climate alarmists weren't there, there would hardly be people being vocal against the idea of global warming. There are headlines with things like "Earth will be ice-free by 2014" or something like that, and then it doesn't happen and they just get made fun of. Why not just focus on technology efficiency, policies reducing earth policy by developing cleaner technology, etc? I doubt there would be huge backlashes against these ideas if they governments just worked on trying to get companies to develop cleaner ways of doing things instead of claiming "2030 is beyond the climate tipping point" or something similar.
Exactly. I agree with you 100% Stuffy :D :thumbup:
Central Abbotsford
50m (164ft)

2022/23 season snowfall: 76.8cm

:team: :snowwindow: :snowman:
User avatar
Glacier
Model Rider
Model Rider
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 2:21 pm
Location: Vernon
Elevation: 545m/1788 ft
Has thanked: 440 times
Been thanked: 4127 times

Re: Winter 2020-2021

Post by Glacier »

AbbyJr wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:18 am I'm not reading that source because it's from the media. Send me a link to an actual study done by scientists and I'll read it.
Ultimately, the data speaks for itself.

Because I don't have much time here, I just picked a single random station with 120+ years of data: Kamloops. Note that the snowiest period on record was 50 years ago in the 1970s... but also notice that the least snowy period on record was 80 years ago.
kamloopssnowx.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Typeing3
Weather Psycho
Weather Psycho
Posts: 12649
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 3:02 pm
Location: Coquitlam
Elevation: 25M./80Ft.
Has thanked: 22023 times
Been thanked: 24385 times

Re: Climate Change Discussion

Post by Typeing3 »

:typing: :type3:
East Coquitlam
Elevation 25M (80Ft)
#MrJanuary :geek: 8-)
User avatar
Weather101
Storm Chaser
Storm Chaser
Posts: 5092
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:27 am
Location: Richmond
Elevation: 3 Ft
Has thanked: 4754 times
Been thanked: 7100 times

Re: Climate Change Discussion

Post by Weather101 »

Typeing3 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:58 pm Yep, the data speaks for itself. :thumbup:
https://twitter.com/YVR__Weather/status ... 17/photo/1
Woah
All about them Cowboys !!! 🤠 🤠
User avatar
Weather101
Storm Chaser
Storm Chaser
Posts: 5092
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:27 am
Location: Richmond
Elevation: 3 Ft
Has thanked: 4754 times
Been thanked: 7100 times

Re: Climate Change Discussion

Post by Weather101 »

All about them Cowboys !!! 🤠 🤠
User avatar
Glacier
Model Rider
Model Rider
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 2:21 pm
Location: Vernon
Elevation: 545m/1788 ft
Has thanked: 440 times
Been thanked: 4127 times

Re: Climate Change Discussion

Post by Glacier »

Typeing3 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:58 pm Yep, the data speaks for itself. :thumbup:
https://twitter.com/YVR__Weather/status ... 17/photo/1
How are they deriving 119 years worth of data when no station in the Vancouver area has been around that long? The general trend is true, but the magnitude is way off. I mean, if they are comparing YVR to an further inland station prior to YVR, then the data would be skewed.

In 82 years the snowfall has decreased by 21.8 cm (0.266 cm/ year) according the YVR graph. Your graph shows a rate of almost double this amount!

BTW, the amount of snowfall at YVR has been increasing at a rate of 0.26 cm/year since 1997, mind you, that's only 23 years, so only 6.1 cm more snowfall at YVR today than 23 years ago, which doesn't make up for massive drop in the 1970s.
yvrsnow.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ovonucks
Cloud Watcher
Cloud Watcher
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 9:04 pm
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 161 times

Re: Climate Change Discussion

Post by Ovonucks »

Too many facts in there. No way anything is true. :roll:
Post Reply