Climate Change Discussion

[Weather101]

Doing a MSC in Atmospheric Science years ago saw me conduct numerous projects (experiments) in the field as it pertains to the influence of man made CO2 and CH4 emissions and climate change.

Yes there are what I now deem to be external factors within and outside the atmosphere. Overall...the one constant is that humans are having a major impact on the climate and the outlook is one that sees a warming climate in the poles.

read this abbyjr

[AbbyJr]

Dude I can send you 100 studies done by scientists your still not going too care ? Let alone believe it so I'm not wasting my time. Your just going too put your naive blinders on it's pretty ridiculous.

We can agree to disagree.

[Ovonucks]

Dude I can send you 100 studies done by scientists your still not going too care ? Let alone believe it so I'm not wasting my time. Your just going too put your naive blinders on it's pretty ridiculous.

"From the media" lol. Guy doesn't realize the CONTENT in the article comes from actual studies. By scientists. Dude has taken the Trump "fake news" mantra too literally.

[Storm]

I'm not reading that source because it's from the media. Send me a link to an actual study done by scientists and I'll read it.

tenor.gif

[wetcoast91]

I would respect climate change deniers way more if they just outright said they didn't give a two shits about a warming climate. My brother has said exactly that...he is 39 and the prospect of him being directly impacted is next to 0 in his lifetime.

[stuffradio]

I would respect climate change deniers way more if they just outright said they didn't give a two shits about a warming climate. My brother has said exactly that...he is 39 and the prospect of him being directly impacted is next to 0 in his lifetime.

I bet if the hyperbole from climate alarmists weren't there, there would hardly be people being vocal against the idea of global warming. There are headlines with things like "Earth will be ice-free by 2014" or something like that, and then it doesn't happen and they just get made fun of. Why not just focus on technology efficiency, policies reducing earth policy by developing cleaner technology, etc? I doubt there would be huge backlashes against these ideas if they governments just worked on trying to get companies to develop cleaner ways of doing things instead of claiming "2030 is beyond the climate tipping point" or something similar.

[Weather101]

"From the media" lol. Guy doesn't realize the CONTENT in the article comes from actual studies. By scientists. Dude has taken the Trump "fake news" mantra too literally.

lmao he doesn't even read it because he thinks anything is fake, This is why we will never fix a warming planet because their is millions of people like him.
Nito clearly explained his study did you see Abbyjr saying anything about it? People who deny have zero facts they just say " not true" lmao

[Weather101]

We can agree to disagree.

lol that only works when there isn't actual legit facts proving that your wrong...

[AbbyJr]

I bet if the hyperbole from climate alarmists weren't there, there would hardly be people being vocal against the idea of global warming. There are headlines with things like "Earth will be ice-free by 2014" or something like that, and then it doesn't happen and they just get made fun of. Why not just focus on technology efficiency, policies reducing earth policy by developing cleaner technology, etc? I doubt there would be huge backlashes against these ideas if they governments just worked on trying to get companies to develop cleaner ways of doing things instead of claiming "2030 is beyond the climate tipping point" or something similar.

Exactly. I agree with you 100% Stuffy

[Glacier]

I'm not reading that source because it's from the media. Send me a link to an actual study done by scientists and I'll read it.

Ultimately, the data speaks for itself.

Because I don't have much time here, I just picked a single random station with 120+ years of data: Kamloops. Note that the snowiest period on record was 50 years ago in the 1970s... but also notice that the least snowy period on record was 80 years ago.

kamloopssnowx.png

[Typeing3]

Yep, the data speaks for itself.
https://twitter.com/YVR__Weather/status ... 17/photo/1

[Weather101]

Yep, the data speaks for itself.
https://twitter.com/YVR__Weather/status ... 17/photo/1

Woah

[Weather101]

Yikes

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/drama ... 1601495655

[Glacier]

Yep, the data speaks for itself.
https://twitter.com/YVR__Weather/status ... 17/photo/1

How are they deriving 119 years worth of data when no station in the Vancouver area has been around that long? The general trend is true, but the magnitude is way off. I mean, if they are comparing YVR to an further inland station prior to YVR, then the data would be skewed.

In 82 years the snowfall has decreased by 21.8 cm (0.266 cm/ year) according the YVR graph. Your graph shows a rate of almost double this amount!

BTW, the amount of snowfall at YVR has been increasing at a rate of 0.26 cm/year since 1997, mind you, that's only 23 years, so only 6.1 cm more snowfall at YVR today than 23 years ago, which doesn't make up for massive drop in the 1970s.

yvrsnow.png

[Ovonucks]

Yikes

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/drama ... 1601495655

Too many facts in there. No way anything is true.